craziness

Webster defines "Monarchy" as a government having a hereditary chief of state with life tenure and powers varying from nominal to absolute.

While we in the states still enjoy a presidency without a life-long tenure (real proof that God exists and loves us), we've been tiptoeing dangerously close to hereditary rule for some time now. At the end of this month, I will celebrate my 23rd birthday. During those years, there has been NO time at which either a Bush or Clinton was not at least the VP. Also during those same years, the population of the United States surpassed the 300 million mark. I refuse to believe that in a country this large that there are only TWO families capable of producing leaders for this country. That notion is tantamount to insanity.

So now for some light gimping.

I will not willingly vote myself into the worlds newest monarchy.

I did the math, and should the American people elect Queen Mother Clinton to 2 terms as president, guess who turns 36 in 2016? Thats right, Chelsea. We could, at least in theory have the Clintons in the White House for the next 16 years. I'd move to Great Britain (at least they're out in the open about their system of government).

So if you're in Ohio, Texas, or Pennsylvania and are leaning to the left, or care at all for maintaining the democratic principles that made this country great, get yourself registered to vote and cast your ballot.

A Vote for Obama is a vote against tacit monarchy.